There are generally three types of papers, thought papers, research papers, and papers that are creative. There can be components of all three present, but papers largely belong to among the three categories. The focus on REL 303 could be the thought paper; no outside scientific studies are required. The focus on REL 407 in the shorter papers is the idea paper; no research that is outside required. The focus on REL 407 in the final paper may be either a thought paper, which requires no outside research, or a research paper involving utilization of outside sources.</p>
- a) Thought papers can make usage of materials beyond the required reading but will not need to do this. Rather, the focus is on careful study, analysis, and elaboration of ideas presented within a context that is limited such as for example just one article or book with some support from assigned secondary readings. It is beneficial to focus on a couple of ideas, passages, or paragraphs and look at the ramifications thereof.
- b) Research papers deal with a study that is careful of evidence accessible to support and refute arguments. You are not required to go to outside material, however it is often useful to obtain supporting evidence beyond what is found in the required texts to back your assertions up.
- c) Creative papers can include forms such as for instance fictional narrative, personal narrative, poetry, and illustrations as a key part or all the finished product. It’s important to work closely utilizing the instructor if you wish to do a more project that is creative.
- d) you could write using one associated with suggested topics, or you may formulate your very own topic; in the latter case you’ll want to write out a paragraph-length topic and submit it by email to your instructor for approval.
- e) Sometimes it might happen that a far more personal narrative style may be incorporated into the writing, one which includes personal experiences, fictional narrative, or reflections in regards to the writing process. Some of the suggested paper topics will elicit styles that are different genres of writing. However, it can be more challenging to adopt styles that are alternative genres. If you wish to pursue different avenues of writing but are unsure about how to repeat this, samples are offered for your perusal.
Peer review drafts will undoubtedly be required for some papers. Guidelines for peer review will be made available separately.
Although grading is an imprecise art, you are able to attain a substantial amount of consistency. As a whole, the important thing points are: Represent ideas fairly and accurately, raise critical questions and doubts, explore theses questions and doubts to give you a account that is sophisticated of ideas and issues under consideration, and write clearly. I search for listed here when reading papers:
- a) Writing. In the event that you write clearly and grammatically, you will think clearly and in an organized fashion. If you were to think clearly, this will be reflected in your writing.
- b) Accuracy. Have you represented the ideas that are relevant?
- c) Focus and balance that is coverage-a of two. From the one hand, perhaps you have covered the main ideas relevant to your topic? On the other side, will you be focused enough? A feeling of the larger picture must certanly be present, but pursuing way too many themes or ideas leads to confusion.
- d) Sophistication and depth. Perhaps you have taken into consideration various facets of a problem or idea? You may be accurate at a general level (“The Buddha was a seeker of truth.”), you can also be accurate at a sophisticated level (“The Buddha was a seeker of truth who formulated his understanding with regards to the four noble truths.”). Have possible questions and objections been taken into account?
- e) Creativity. Have you been open to unexpected insights and a sense of adventure?
Although there are no cast in stone rules, you should get a B. Provided you have gone that far, you can add further dimensions to your paper if you cover criteria a) through c. When you have any queries about comments We have made in your paper or your grade, please come to see me. It is necessary in my situation to learn of any doubts or problems.
By monitoring these guidelines, i am hoping that your learning experience shall be a little more pleasurable and rewarding for both all of us. These guidelines are meant to assist you to polish an art and craft, academic writing, as you progress that you are developing. Don’t get so hung up about them which you feel your creative processes hindered. If anything, they should provide just an adequate amount of a framework to state your analytical and skills that are creative. The accompanying essay emphasizes the creative element of paper writing.
I like writing. Me before can pop up in my mind, or once confused and fragmentary information and thought can be spontaneously organized and become clear when I am totally absorbed in writing, many ideas which have never occurred to. It is the most moments that are satisfactory me.
Yet, I often struggle for long periods trying to organize ideas as you’re watching cruel paper that is white. This is especially true once I am wanting to be systematic and logical, beginning with a plan. Since anything unclear or vague is eliminated in the process of earning a plan, the paper turns out to be organized, clear, and compact, but I rarely have a sense of satisfaction.
What is the distinction between a paper which emerges spontaneously and one that begins with a problem for logical consistency? I’ve been wondering how I can bridge the gap between these two kinds of writing as well as the attitudes they represent. I’ve discovered some clues to these nagging problems in three articles authored by Donald Murray, Peter Elbow, and William Stafford.
What they emphasize in keeping is the procedure; writing is not the description of a total result; in reality, writing itself can create the result. This means before we begin that we should not worry too much about how the last draft will turn out, or how we can organize all of our ideas. According to Murray, what we requirement for writing is enough information and a clear purpose: logic or order can appear later in the process. Elbow even denies the necessity for coherence in the initial stages of producing writing. He suggests “freewriting,” which activates the writing process by getting rid of any concern about correction. Also, Stafford remarks that the main things for his writing are receptivity and a willingness to stop standards that are high. For all of these writers, logic and organization, which includes restricted me in some ways, are secondary in the stage that is initial of. It is true that logical rigor is very important, but we are able to be concerned about that just as much that we want to say as we like after everything has been written down.
The most important thing in writing is, once the three writers agree, the productivity of writing. In accordance with Murray, for instance, writing is the method of “making something that had not been there before, finding significance where others find confusion and bringing order to chaos.”By writing you will find new stuff, which may be a new thought, a new feeling, a unique idea, or even a fresh self that you simply could not have discovered without writing.
To be able to promote this type or sort of productivity, Murray, Elbow, and Stafford agree with the importance of opening our minds. Murray points out that writing gives us a chance to capture, during the level that is conscious unconscious feelings and ideas we had not noticed or had forgotten. Elbow says freewriting is a strategy to make our consciousness empty in order that we are able to pick out something unconscious from deep within our hearts. Stafford remarks that the power letting him write is not a device that is conscious his “own weak, wandering, diffident impulses” and his “confident reliance” upon these impulses.
Writing could be in comparison to a piece of cake blowing towards the small window between consciousness and unconsciousness. The window is generally closed because consciousness is just too strong to allow the window open, and one ultimately ends up located in only half of the house, that is, the world that is entire of’s existence. Nevertheless when writing occurs using the mind open, a breeze opens the window plus one can encounter other facets of the self, and sometimes even another self and be a little more fully integrated: the sweetness for the writing process might even end up being the act of some other self.